World’s first dual-frequency GNSS smartphone hits the market


This displays when logged out
https://www.gsa.europa.eu/newsroom/news/world-s-first-dual-frequency-gnss-smartphone-hits-market

Xiaomi – one of the fastest growing mobile brands – has launched the world’s first dual-frequency GNSS smartphone. Fitted with a Broadcom BCM47755 chip, the Xiaomi Mi 8, launched on May 31, is the world’s first smartphone providing up to decimetre-level accuracy for location-based services and vehicle navigation.

NPR Connections Podcast : Historical Discovery in Ontario County

http://wxxinews.org/post/connections-historical-discovery-ontario-county

From the NPR archives –  MAY 28, 2015

Sometimes a small archaeological discovery can tell us more than we first realize. We’re digging into the dirt of South Bristol, Ontario County, where just such a discovery is a window into our history. It’s a preview of the ongoing “Science on the Edge” lecture series at the Rochester Museum and Science Center with Ann Morton of Morton Archeological Research Services.

Rome Wasn’t Built in a Day….

…But it is making great strides forward

MARS is working with the city of Rome to help complete a multi-million dollar downtown revitalization project that includes re-watering the old Erie Canal and much more.

http://www.romerises.com/come-build-with-us/

http://www.romerises.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2A-Waterfront-Plan.pdf

http://www.romerises.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2B-Waterfront-Sections.pdf

http://www.romerises.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/4-Streetscape-Improvements-Concept-Plan.pdf

 

130k-Year-Old Arch Site with Dr. Steven Holen

From the Archaeotech podcast:

An in depth conversation with Chris Webster and Dr. Steven Holen, we would love to hear your thoughts regarding this topic

Dr. Steven Holen, the primary author on a letter in Nature at the end of April, 2017 detailing a site from San Diego, CA with an apparent 130,000 year old archaeological site. It’s a controversial find and we try to get into the science and figure out what’s going on and where we go from here.

https://www.archaeologypodcastnetwork.com/all-shows/tas-15

Check out the Archaeology Podcast Network for a wide variety of great topics regarding archaeology and the cultural resource management industry

 

Critics attack study that rewrote human arrival in Americas

Mounting skepticism challenges report that put hominins on continent more than 100,000 years earlier than most scientists accept.
Drawer full of Cerutti Mastadon site fossils at SDNHM

Markings on fossils from an extinct elephant relative called a mastodon are at the centre of a row over when humans reached the Americas.Credit: Kate Johnson, SDNHM

Archaeologists are taking aim at a controversial study that claimed to rewrite theories about when humans first reached the Americas, one of the biggest questions in palaeoanthropology.

When researchers made the astonishing suggestion last year that early humans settled the Americas 100,000 years earlier than thought, they asked doubters to keep an open mind and consider the evidence backing their claim. But their study1, which proposed that mastodon bones from California were broken by an as-yet-unidentified group of early humans 130,000 years ago, was instantly questioned by archaeologists. Most researchers agree that humans settled the Americas around 15,000 years ago.

Nearly a year later, the sceptics are still not convinced. In a rebuttal to the work, published on 7 February in Nature2, archaeologists say that modern construction equipment better explains the mastodon bone damage than does the handiwork of ancient hominins. They present an analysis of mammoth bones from Texas that, they say, have similar-looking damage, which was caused by natural wear and tear and heavy equipment.

“It calls into question the basis for their paper,” says Joseph Ferraro at Baylor University’s Institute of Archaeology in Waco, Texas. He says his team began their critique soon after the original claims were published in Nature in April 2017.

Telltale signs

In the original study, a team co-led by Tom Deméré, a palaeontologist at the San Diego Natural History Museum in California, examined bone fragments of a mastodon (Mammut americanum), an extinct relative of elephants, that had been found during roadworks in suburban San Diego in the 1990s. Deméré and archaeologist Steven Holen at the Center for American Paleolithic Research in Hot Springs, South Dakota, contended that the remains bore telltale fractures seen in bones struck by the stone tools of early humans. No obvious stone tools or human remains were found at the site.

Deméré’s team also established that the mastodon bones were around 130,000 years old, and suggested that an unknown hominin species had reached California by that time. Current scientific consensus on settlement of the Americas is that early humans from Asia crossed the Bering land bridge into Alaska around 20,000 years ago, a theory based on archaeological research and studies of modern and ancient DNA.

To rebut the mastodon claim, Ferraro’s team examined a site in Waco containing the remains of at least 26 mammoths that died about 60,000 years ago. Archaeologists have previously looked for evidence of humans at the site and found none. According to Ferraro, some of the mammoth bones were battered and broken in the same way as the bones from the San Diego site.

Ferraro thinks that construction work — some of the Waco mammoth bones were found during a building project — and natural wear can explain the similarities. One type of bone break found at both sites, a spiral fracture, has been seen as far back as the Triassic period. “A dinosaur would break a leg. It happens. There are natural processes that could reasonably explain spiral fractures,” says Ferraro.

Damage questions

In a response published3 alongside the critique, Deméré and his colleagues stand by their assertion, and say the resemblance between the bones from the sites is merely superficial, and that comparing the sites is not appropriate. “We’re really quite familiar with what kind of damage is caused by heavy equipment,” Deméré adds. He asks doubters to come to San Diego to look at the material in person before making a judgement.

David Meltzer, an archaeologist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas, who co-wrote an earlier critique4 of the 2017 study, is glad to see other groups questioning the strength of the evidence. Meltzer says that he is open to the idea that humans reached the Americas more than 100,000 years before he thought — just not on the basis of such equivocal data.

“Given everything we know, it makes no sense,” he says. “You’re not going to flip people’s opinion 180 degrees unless you’ve got absolutely unimpeachable evidence, and this ain’t it.”

How to Bake Ancient Roman Bread Dating Back to 79 AD: A Video Primer

Ecce panis—try your hand at the kind of loaf that Mel Brooks’ 2000-year-old man might have sunk his teeth into. Literally.

In 1930 a loaf of bread dating to AD 79 (the year Vesuvius claimed two prosperous Roman towns) was excavated from the site of a bakery in Herculaneum.

Eighty-three years later, the British Museum invited London chef Giorgio Locatelli, above, to take a stab at creating an edible facsimile for its Pompeii Live exhibition.

The assignment wasn’t as easy as he’d anticipated, the telegenic chef confesses before whipping up a lovely brown miche that appears far more mouth watering than the carbonized round found in the Herculaneum oven.

OpenCulture.com